Shuka masu azabtarwa: tunani akan labarin O. Kozyrev

Ba a tattauna batun cin ganyayyaki don dalilai na addini ba a cikin talifin: “Na fahimci waɗanda ba sa cin nama don dalilai na addini. Wannan wani bangare ne na bangaskiyarsu kuma ba shi da ma'ana don ko da tafiya a cikin wannan shugabanci - mutum yana da 'yancin yin imani da abin da yake da muhimmanci a gare shi. <…> Mu ci gaba zuwa rukunin masu shiga tsakani waɗanda abubuwan da ba na addini ba suke da mahimmanci. Babban tanadi na marubucin sune kamar haka: Tambaya ta gaba ta zo: to me yasa tsire-tsire suka "laifi" a gaban dabbobi? Labarin ya sa masu cin ganyayyaki masu da'a suyi tunani game da dacewa da salon rayuwarsu. Ni ba mai cin ganyayyaki ba ne. Amma da yake labarin ya sa ni ma in yi tunani, ina ganin ya dace in faɗi amsar da zan yi ga tambayar da aka yi. Duk wani nau'in abinci, idan an yi tunani da daidaito, yana biyan bukatun jiki na bitamin da ma'adanai. A nufin, za mu iya zama duka biyu "mafarauta" da " herbivores ". Wannan jin yana wanzuwa a cikinmu ta yanayi: gwada nuna wa yaro wurin kisan kiyashi - kuma za ku ga mummunan halinsa. Wurin tsinke 'ya'yan itace ko yankan kunnuwa ba ya haifar da irin wannan motsin rai, a wajen kowace irin akida. Mawakan Romantic suna son yin baƙin ciki a kan "kunne da ke lalacewa a ƙarƙashin lauyoyin mai girbi mai kisa", amma a cikin yanayinsu wannan ƙa'ida ce kawai don kwatanta rayuwar ɗan adam ta gushewa, kuma ba ta wata hanya ta yanayin muhalli ... Don haka, tsari. na tambayar labarin ya dace a matsayin motsa jiki na hankali da falsafa, amma baƙon abu ga palette na tunanin ɗan adam. Wataƙila marubucin zai yi gaskiya idan masu cin ganyayyaki masu ɗa’a suka bi sanannen barkwancin: “Kuna son dabbobi? A'a, Ina ƙin tsire-tsire. Amma ba haka bane. Da yake jaddada cewa masu cin ganyayyaki a kowane hali suna kashe tsire-tsire da kwayoyin cuta, marubucin yana zargin su da yaudara da rashin daidaituwa. “Rayuwa lamari ne na musamman. Kuma wauta ce a yanka shi a kan layin tsiron nama. Wannan rashin adalci ne ga dukkan abubuwa masu rai. Yana da magudi, bayan duk. <...> A irin wannan yanayi, dankali, radishes, burdock, alkama ba su da wata dama. Tsire-tsire masu shuru za su yi asara ga dabbobi masu fure.” Ga alama mai gamsarwa. Duk da haka, a gaskiya, ba ra'ayin duniya ba ne na masu cin ganyayyaki, amma ra'ayin marubucin "ko dai ku ci kowa ko ku ci kowa" wanda ba shi da hankali ga yara. Wannan yana daidai da faɗin - "idan ba za ku iya nuna tashin hankali ba - to ku bar shi ya fito daga allon wasannin kwamfuta a kan tituna", "idan ba za ku iya hana sha'awar sha'awa ba, to ku shirya abubuwan ban sha'awa." Amma wannan shine yadda mutumin ƙarni na XNUMX ya kamata ya kasance? “A koyaushe yana bani mamaki cewa a cikin masu fafutukar kare hakkin dabbobi mutum na iya samun cin zarafi ga mutane. Muna rayuwa a wani lokaci mai ban mamaki lokacin da irin wannan kalma kamar ta'addanci ta bayyana. Daga ina wannan sha'awar makanta ta fito? A cikin masu fafutukar cin ganyayyaki, mutum na iya haduwa da zalunci, kiyayya, ba kasa da cikin wadanda ke farauta ba.” Tabbas, duk wani ta'addanci muni ne, amma ana kiran zanga-zangar lumana na "kore" don nuna rashin amincewa da take haƙƙin ɗan adam. Misali, zanga-zangar adawa da shigo da sharar nukiliya (daga Turai) zuwa cikin kasarmu don sarrafawa da zubar (a Rasha). Tabbas, akwai masu cin ganyayyaki masu tsattsauran ra'ayi waɗanda suke shirye su shaƙe "mutumin mai nama", amma yawancin mutane masu hankali ne: daga Bernard Shaw zuwa Plato. Har zuwa wani lokaci, na fahimci abin da marubucin yake ji. A Rasha mai tsanani, inda ’yan shekarun da suka shige ba tumaki ba, amma aka yi hadaya da mutane a kan bagadan sansanonin fursuna, shin a gaban “ƙananan ’yan’uwanmu ne”?

Leave a Reply