Ragewa salon rayuwa ne da ke mayar da hankali kan rage cin nama, kaji, abincin teku, madara, da ƙwai, ba tare da la’akari da inganci ko kuzari ba. An yi la'akari da ra'ayi mai ban sha'awa saboda ba kowa ba ne a shirye ya bi duk-ko-abinci abinci. Duk da haka, raguwa ya haɗa da masu cin ganyayyaki, masu cin ganyayyaki, da duk wanda ya rage yawan kayan dabba a cikin abincinsa.
Ba kamar shan barasa, motsa jiki, da dafa abinci a gida ba, al'umma na kallon cin ganyayyaki a matsayin bangarori masu duhu da fari. Kai ko dai mai cin ganyayyaki ne ko kuma ba kai ba ne. Kada ku ci nama har tsawon shekara guda - kai mai cin ganyayyaki ne. Kada ku sha madara har tsawon watanni biyu - vegan. Ci wani cuku - kasa.
A cewar , an sami karin masu cin ganyayyaki a cikin 2016 fiye da shekaru 10 da suka wuce. Sama da mutane miliyan 1,2 a Burtaniya masu cin ganyayyaki ne. Kuri'ar jin ra'ayin jama'a ta YouGov ta gano cewa kashi 25% na mutane a Burtaniya sun rage cin naman su. Duk da haka, da yawa har yanzu suna riƙe da ra'ayin cewa cin nama kaɗan yana nufin cin kome ba.
Ma'anar ƙa'idar Vegan Society ita ce: "Veganism wata hanya ce ta rayuwa da ke da nufin kawar da duk wani nau'i na cin zarafi da zalunci ga dabbobi don abinci, tufafi, da kowace manufa, gwargwadon yiwuwa." Duk da haka, ga alama mutane sun fahimci shi da ɗan bambanta: "Veganism wata hanya ce ta rayuwa wacce ke keɓance duk wanda ke son ƙara madara a shayi, kuma yana la'antar kowane nau'in rayuwa har sai mutum ya daina ya fara saka tabar wiwi."
“Amma wannan ba gaskiya ba ne,” in ji Brian Kathman. Muna yin zaɓi game da abinci kowace rana. Wani abokina ya taɓa ba ni littafin nan The Ethics of What We Eat (Peter Singer da Jim Mason) sa’ad da nake cin hamburger. Na karanta shi kuma na kasa yarda cewa gonaki da masana'antar nama ne ke da alhakin sauyin yanayi da asarar rayayyun halittu, da kuma karuwar cutar kansa, kiba da cututtukan zuciya. Idan mutane sun yanke cin naman su koda da kashi 10%, hakan zai zama babbar nasara."
Cutman ya girma yana cin nama da fuka-fukan buffalo, amma wata rana ya yanke shawarar zama mai cin ganyayyaki. Sa’ad da ’yar’uwarsa ta ba da shawarar cin ɗan ƙaramin turkey na godiya, ya bayyana shawararsa ta wajen cewa yana so ya zama “cikakke.”
"Na fi sha'awar sakamako fiye da matakai," in ji shi. "Lokacin da mutane suka ci nama kadan, ba wani nau'i ba ne, ba matsayin zamantakewa ba, amma yana da tasiri sosai a duniya."
Falsafar Kathman tabbas tana da kyau. Amma shin yana yiwuwa da gaske ku ɗauki kanku ɗan adam, mai ka'ida kuma har yanzu kuna da ɗan guntun nama?
"Babban jigo na masu rage cin ganyayyaki shine cewa masu cin ganyayyaki da masu cin ganyayyaki waɗanda suka yi nasarar rage cin dabbobi suna cikin nau'in nau'in mutanen da ba su ji daɗin noman masana'anta," in ji Kathman. "Yana da musamman game da daidaitawa ga omnivores."
Baya ga buga littafin, kungiyar Reducer Foundation ta shirya nata taron a birnin New York. Ƙungiyar tana da bidiyoyi da dama, girke-girke da kuma sarari inda magoya bayan sabon motsi za su iya buga littattafansu. Haka kuma, kungiyar tana da dakin gwaje-gwaje nata, wanda ke gudanar da bincike kan yadda zai fi dacewa a rage cin nama.
Yunƙurin "neo-hippies" ya zama abin sha'awa, ba kawai kyakkyawar niyya ba. Duk da haka, yawan mutanen "masu ƙarfi" kadan ne. Yawancin masu cin ganyayyaki da masu cin ganyayyaki suna da juriya da daidaita mutane waɗanda suka fahimci cewa dole ne mu kasance masu aiki da hankali game da wannan. Aƙalla ko ta yaya canza wani abu a cikin abinci - wannan ita ce hanya.
A cewar masu ragi, rashin cin nama nasara ce. Amma cin shi lokaci-lokaci ba kasawa bane. Ba za ku iya "kasa" ko "sake komawa" ba idan kuna son yin wani abu da kanku. Kuma kai ba munafuki bane idan kayi duk mai yiwuwa don barin wani abu gaba daya. Don haka masu ragewa masu cin ganyayyaki ne ba tare da son rai ba? Ko kuwa suna yin abin da za su iya ne?
Source: