Hitler ba mai cin ganyayyaki ba ne

Kafin mu kalli shaidun da ke nuna cewa Hitler ba mai cin ganyayyaki ba ne, yana da kyau mu san daga ina ra’ayin da ya fito, domin wannan muhawara ba ta cika yin adalci ba. Mutanen da suke da'awar cewa Hitler mai cin ganyayyaki ne sukan "ji" game da shi a wani wuri kuma nan da nan suka yanke shawarar cewa gaskiya ne. A lokaci guda kuma, idan ka gaya musu cewa Hitler ba mai cin ganyayyaki ba ne, sun yarda da gaskiyar cin ganyayyaki ba tare da tambaya ba, za su nemi hujja ba zato ba tsammani.

Me ya sa ba sa bukatar shaidar cewa Hitler ba mai cin ganyayyaki ba ne, amma ba sa bukatar shaidar cewa shi ne? Babu shakka, mutane da yawa suna so su gaskata cewa Hitler mai cin ganyayyaki ne. Wataƙila suna tsoron cin ganyayyaki, suna tunanin ba daidai ba ne.

Sannan kuma ra'ayin cewa fitaccen Hitler mai cin ganyayyaki ne ya ba su dalilin karyata duk wani ra'ayi na cin ganyayyaki a lokaci guda. "Hitler mai cin ganyayyaki ne, don haka cin ganyayyaki a kanta yana da lahani!" Tabbas wannan hujja ce ta wauta. Amma abin lura shi ne cewa mutane da yawa suna so su yarda da hakan, don haka ba sa neman wata hujjar cewa Hitler mai cin ganyayyaki ne, amma kwatsam suna son hakan daga mutanen da suke tunanin wani abu.

Idan kuna ganin ina yin karin gishiri game da rawar da masu cin ganyayyaki suka taka wajen ƙirƙirar tatsuniyar Hitla mai cin ganyayyaki, karanta wannan wasiƙar da wani ya aika wa marubuci John Robbins wanda ya lashe lambar yabo, wanda ya rubuta littattafai da yawa kan fa'idar cin abinci mara nama.

Ku mutanen da suka ce dukanmu za mu fi jin daɗin cin ganyayyaki kamar kun manta cewa Adolf Hitler mai cin ganyayyaki ne. Yana bata imaninka, ko ba haka ba? ()

Ya Allah ka dubi wannan: Yana bata imaninka, ko ba haka ba?! Wannan shine yadda yake da mahimmanci ga waɗanda ba masu cin ganyayyaki ba ko Hitler mai cin ganyayyaki ne. Sun yi imanin cewa tun da Hitler ya kasance mai cin ganyayyaki, cin ganyayyaki a cikin kansa ba shi da tabbas. Ta yaya za ku zama mai ban dariya?

Masu tunani za su fahimci cewa ko da Hitler mai cin ganyayyaki ne, ba kome ba. Ba zai “rasa imaninmu ba.” Wani lokaci miyagun mutane suna yin zaɓi mai kyau. Ba shi da wuyar fahimta. Idan Hitler ya zaɓi cin ganyayyaki kawai, yana ɗaya daga cikin mafi kyawun zaɓi na rayuwarsa. Idan yana son dara, ba zai bata sunan dara ba. Hasali ma, daya daga cikin fitattun ‘yan wasan Ches a tarihin wasan, Bobby Fischer, ya kasance mai kyamar Yahudawa, amma babu wanda ya daina buga dara saboda haka.

To, idan Hitler yana cikin dara? Waɗanda ba su buga dara ba za su yi wa ’yan wasan ba’a? A'a, saboda mutanen da ba sa wasan dara ba su damu ba ko wasu sun buga ko a'a. Ba sa jin barazanar 'yan wasan dara. Amma idan ana maganar cin ganyayyaki, al'amura suna ɗaukar wani salo na dabam. Ga irin wannan baƙon dalili ga waɗanda suka tabbatar da cewa Hitler bai ci nama ba.

Kuma tabbas, ko da Hitler ya kasance mai cin ganyayyaki, duk wani mai kisan kai a tarihi ba. Idan muka kiyaye maki, zai zama: Masu kisan gilla: 1, Masu kisan gilla marasa cin ganyayyaki: daruruwan.

Yanzu mun matsa zuwa muhawara mai ban sha'awa: Hitler vs. Benjamin Franklin. Franklin ya kasance mai cin ganyayyaki kusan shekara guda, daga shekara 16 zuwa 17 (), amma, ba shakka, mutane kaɗan ne suka sani game da shi. Idan aka gaya wa mai cin nama (a bisa kuskure) cewa Franklin mai cin ganyayyaki ne, nan da nan za su so su san ko ya taɓa cin nama, kuma idan ya yarda cewa ya ci, za su ce da laifi: “Aha!” Za su yi ihu cikin nasara, "Don haka Franklin ba ainihin mai cin ganyayyaki ba ne, ko?!" Yana ba ni bakin ciki sosai ganin yadda ake samun sabani da yawa a cikin wannan yanayin.

Wannan yana da mahimmanci, saboda mutane iri ɗaya suna da ma'auni mafi laushi ga Hitler. Franklin na iya cin nama sau ɗaya a kowace shekara huɗu, kuma za a karyata cin ganyayyakinsa, amma idan Hitler ya taɓa cin dankali - bam! – Shi mai cin ganyayyaki ne. Wannan kuma yana da mahimmanci saboda akwai bayanai da yawa da Hitler ya ci nama a tsawon rayuwarsa, amma waɗanda suka ɗauki Hitler a matsayin mai cin ganyayyaki suna yin watsi da su cikin sauƙi.

Ga Franklin, ma'auni ya bambanta: Franklin dole ne ya guje wa nama 100% na lokacinsa, duk rayuwarsa, daga haihuwa zuwa mutuwa, ba tare da gajiyawa ba, in ba haka ba ba za a iya la'akari da shi a matsayin mai cin ganyayyaki ba. Kamar tunanin cewa Hitler, wanda sau ɗaya bai ci nama ba, mai cin ganyayyaki ne, kuma Franklin, wanda ya ci kifi sau ɗaya a cikin shekaru shida ba tare da nama ba. (Don fayyace: kamar yadda muka fada a baya, Franklin ya kasance mai cin ganyayyaki na kusan shekara guda, amma da yawa ba su sani ba game da shi. Ina magana ne game da yadda mutane suke da bambancin ra'ayi ga Hitler da kowa da kowa.)

To me ake nufi da zama mai cin ganyayyaki? Yawancin mutane za su yarda cewa wannan yanke shawara ne mai hankali, ko menene dalilin da ya sa. Amma bisa ga wannan ma'auni, Franklin ya kasance mai cin ganyayyaki kusan shekara guda, kuma sauran lokacin bai kasance ba. Game da Hitler, babu wata gamsasshiyar hujja da ke nuna cewa ya yi riko da cin ganyayyaki na wani lokaci mai tsawo ko ƙasa da haka.

Yawancin majiyoyi sun ce ya ci nama a cikin shekarun 1930 (duba ƙasa). Jim kaɗan kafin mutuwarsa (a cikin 1941 da 1942) ya yi iƙirarin cewa shi mai cin ganyayyaki ne, kuma masu goyon bayan ra'ayin "Hitler ya kasance mai cin ganyayyaki!" manne da shi. Bayan haka, Hitler ba zai yi ƙarya ko ƙari ba, ko? To, ina nufin, muna magana ne game da Hitler, wa zai yi tunanin zai yi jayayya da gaskiyar Hitler? Idan ba ku amince da Hitler ba, wa za ku iya amincewa? Idan za mu zaɓi mutum ɗaya a Duniya wanda kalmarsa za mu gaskata ba tare da sharadi ba, zai zama Hitler, daidai? Tabbas, mun yi imani cewa kowace kalma da Hitler ya yi za a iya amincewa da ita ba tare da wani sharadi ba, ba tare da kokwanto ba!

Rynne Berry ta ƙara da cewa: “Don fayyace: Hitler ya yi iƙirarin cewa shi mai cin ganyayyaki ne… amma majiyoyin da aka ambata a cikin littafina sun ce yayin da yake magana game da cin ganyayyaki, ba ya bin wannan abincin koyaushe.”

A gaskiya ma, mutane da yawa suna amfani da kalmar "cin ganyayyaki" don bayyana abincin da ba mai cin ganyayyaki ba ne ko kaɗan, kuma lamarin Hitler ba ya nan. Wata talifi mai kwanan watan Mayu 30, 1937, “At Home with the Fuhrer,” ta ce: “An san cewa Hitler mai cin ganyayyaki ne kuma ba ya sha ko shan taba. Abincin rana da abincin dare sun ƙunshi yawancin miya, ƙwai, kayan lambu da ruwan ma'adinai, kodayake wani lokacin yakan canza kansa da ɗan naman alade kuma yana lalata abincinsa na yau da kullun da irin abubuwan abinci kamar caviar ... "Wato, lokacin da Hitler ya ce yana da mai cin ganyayyaki, kusan tabbas yana da wannan mahallin a zuciya: shi “mai cin ganyayyaki” ne mai cin nama. Kamar wani ya ce, “Ni ba ɗan fashi ba ne! Ina fashin banki ne kawai a wata.”

Ga wadanda suka dage cewa kalmomin Hitler game da cin ganyayyaki a cikin 1940s dole ne a dauki su a zahiri, ga ainihin gem daga "Hitler Book" game da al'amuransa na yau da kullum a 1944: "Bayan tsakar dare (Eva) ya ba da umarnin ciye-ciye mai sauƙi daga miya kunkuru, sandwiches da tsiran alade." Idan da gaske Hitler mai cin ganyayyaki ne, shi mai cin ganyayyaki ne.

A ƙasa akwai ƴan labarai game da ainihin abincin Hitler.  

Daga Juyin Halitta a Gina Jiki na John Robbins:

Ana daukar Robert Payne a matsayin mawallafin tarihin Hitler. A cikin littafinsa Hitler: The Life and Death of Adolf Hitler, Payne ya rubuta cewa “cin cin ganyayyaki” na Hitler “tatsuniya” ne da “almara” wanda Joseph Goebbels, Ministan Farfagandar Nazi ya ƙirƙira.

Payne ya rubuta: “Kwancewar Hitler ya taka muhimmiyar rawa a hoton da ya yi hasashe a Jamus. A cewar wani labari da aka yi imani da shi, ba ya shan taba, ba ya sha, ba ya cin nama, ko wata dangantaka da mata. Na farko kawai yayi daidai. Ya sha shan giya da ruwan inabi mai narkewa, yana jin daɗin tsiran alade na Bavaria kuma yana da wata farka, Eva Braun… Ya asceticism wani almara ne da Goebbels ya ƙirƙira don jaddada sha'awarsa, kamun kai da nisa tsakaninsa da sauran mutane. Da wannan tsattsauran ra'ayi, ya bayyana cewa ya sadaukar da kansa ga hidimar jama'arsa. Hasali ma, ya kasance yana biyan buqatarsa, babu wani abu na zaqi gare shi.

Daga Ƙungiyar Cin Ganyayyaki ta Toronto:

Ko da yake likitoci sun rubuta wa Hitler abinci mai cin ganyayyaki don maganin bacin rai da rashin narkewar abinci, masu tarihin rayuwarsa, irin su Albert Speer, Robert Payne, John Toland, da sauransu, sun yarda cewa yana son naman alade, tsiran alade da sauran jita-jita na nama. Ko da Spencer ya ce Hitler ya kasance mai cin ganyayyaki kawai tun 1931: "Yana da kyau a ce har zuwa 1931 ya fi son cin ganyayyaki, amma wani lokacin ya kauce daga gare ta." Ya kashe kansa a cikin wani bunk a shekara ta 1945 yana dan shekara 56. Wato zai iya zama mai cin ganyayyaki tsawon shekaru 14, amma muna da shaida daga shugabar sa, Dion Lucas, wadda ta rubuta a cikin littafinta na Gourmet Cooking School cewa abincin da ta fi so. wanda sau da yawa ya bukaci - cushe tattabarai. "Ba na so in lalata ƙaunar ku ga tattabarai masu cushe, amma kuna iya sha'awar sanin cewa Mista Hitler, wanda sau da yawa yana cin abinci a otal, yana son wannan tasa sosai."

Daga Shirin Dabbobi na 1996 edition wanda aka danganta ga Roberta Kalechofsky

A kokarin bata sunan masu fafutukar kare hakkin dabbobi, masu fafutukar binciken dabbobi sun yi ikirarin a kafafen yada labarai cewa Hitler mai cin ganyayyaki ne kuma Nazis ba su gwada dabbobi ba.

Wadannan "bayani" ana zargin su bayyana mummunar alaƙa tsakanin Nazis da masu rajin kare hakkin dabbobi kuma sun yi gargadin cewa masu kare hakkin dabbobi ba su da mutunci. Amma gaskiya game da Hitler da Nazis ta yi nisa da tatsuniyoyi. Amsa ɗaya mai adalci ga irin waɗannan ikirari ita ce, ba kome ba ne idan Hitler ɗan cin ganyayyaki ne; kamar yadda Peter Singer ya ce, "Gaskiyar cewa Hitler yana da hanci ba yana nufin za mu yanke hancinmu ba."

Bayanan tarihin tarihin Hitler ya nuna cewa akwai sabani a cikin asusun abincinsa. Sau da yawa ana kwatanta shi a matsayin mai cin ganyayyaki, amma a lokaci guda ya kasance mai matukar sha'awar tsiran alade da caviar, kuma wani lokacin naman alade. Ɗaya daga cikin mawallafin tarihinsa, Robert Payne (Rayuwa da Mutuwar Adolf Hitler), bai shiga cikin tatsuniyar tatsuniyar Hitler ba, yana rubuta cewa da gangan ne Nazis suka ciyar da wannan hoton don ƙara tsarki da tabbaci ga siffar Hitler.

Marubucin tarihin rayuwa John Toland ("Adolf Hitler") ya bayyana abincin daliban Hitler da ya kunshi "madara, tsiran alade da burodi".

Bugu da ƙari, Hitler bai taɓa haɓaka cin ganyayyaki a matsayin manufar jama'a don lafiya ko dalilai na ɗabi'a ba. Rashin tallafi ga cin ganyayyaki yayi magana sosai game da shugaba wanda ya himmatu wajen inganta manufofin kiwon lafiya, dokar hana shan sigari da muhalli, da matakan mata masu juna biyu da masu haihuwa.

Jita-jita cewa 'yan Nazi sun zartar da wata doka da ta hana raye-raye kuma suna da cece-kuce. Babu irin wannan dokar, kodayake Nazis yayi magana game da wanzuwarta. An ƙaddamar da Dokar Hana Vivisection a cikin 1933.  

The Lancet, wata babbar jarida ta likitancin Burtaniya, ta sake nazarin dokar a cikin 1934 kuma ta gargadi masu adawa da vivisection cewa ya yi wuri a yi bikin, domin a zahiri bai da bambanci da dokar Burtaniya da aka yi a 1876, wacce ta takaita wasu binciken dabbobi amma ba ta hana. shi. . Likitocin Nazi sun ci gaba da gudanar da gwaje-gwaje masu yawa akan dabbobi.

Akwai fiye da isassun shaidu na gwaje-gwajen dabbobi. A cikin Dark Face na Kimiyya, John Vivien ya taƙaita:

"Gwaje-gwajen da aka yi a kan fursunonin, saboda duk bambancinsu, suna da abu guda ɗaya - dukkansu ci gaba ne na gwaje-gwaje akan dabbobi. An ambaci wallafe-wallafen kimiyyar da ke tabbatar da hakan a cikin dukkan tushe, kuma a cikin sansanin Buchenwald da Auschwitz, gwaje-gwajen dabbobi da na ɗan adam sun kasance ɓangare na shirin guda kuma an gudanar da su a lokaci guda. Yana da mahimmanci mutane su san gaskiyar don kada a yi amfani da tatsuniyoyi game da Hitler da Nazis a kan masu cin ganyayyaki da masu rajin kare hakkin dabbobi.

Masu fafutukar kare hakkin dabbobi kada su bari wadannan kurakuran da'awar su bayyana a kafafen yada labarai ba tare da sunkuyar da kai ba. Muna bukatar mu kawo wa mutane gaskiya. Roberta Kalechofsky marubuci ne, mawallafi, kuma shugabar Yahudawa don Haƙƙin Dabbobi.

Michael Bluejay 2007-2009

 

 

Leave a Reply